This policy explains who publishes ScentOEM content, how claims are scoped, how AI-assisted drafting is handled, and how readers can request a correction.
Who Publishes the Content
ScentOEM content is published by the ScentOEM Editorial Team, an organizational author operated by Shenzhen Dingyuefeng Trading Co., Ltd. We do not present that name as an individual expert and do not assign personal credentials that have not been publicly verified.
The site covers B2B perfume project planning, including commercial paths, packaging, samples, MOQ drivers, supplier verification and document scoping. It does not replace legal, regulatory, safety, customs or destination-market professional advice.
Publication Standards
Each page should answer a defined buyer question, distinguish general guidance from project-specific confirmation, and avoid presenting conditional quantities, timing, documentation or compliance as universal facts. Commercial claims must remain consistent with the public fact base and the visible claim policy.
Pages show publication and modification dates when those dates can be supported by the site history. A date change should reflect a meaningful content or evidence update, not a cosmetic refresh intended to create false freshness.
Sources and Evidence
Where a statement depends on regulation, transport rules, standards or public company information, the preferred source is the responsible regulator, standards body, carrier or official registry. ScentOEM pages may also link to internal process and commercial pages, but an internal link is not treated as independent proof.
Project examples, customer names, logos, quotations, test results and documents are published only when their scope and permission can be confirmed. When evidence cannot be made public, the site describes the limitation instead of inventing a case study.
AI-Assisted Drafting
AI tools may assist with research organization, outlines, drafting, editing or quality checks. AI assistance is not treated as evidence and does not create expertise. Pages intended for indexing must still follow this policy, use only supportable claims, and identify material limitations.
A working draft that still requires brand, technical or legal review should not be presented to search engines as a finished authoritative article. It should remain unpublished or use noindex until its publication status is resolved.
Corrections and Reader Feedback
Readers can report a factual error, outdated source, broken citation or unclear commercial claim by emailing [email protected]. Include the page URL, the statement in question and supporting evidence.
Confirmed material errors should be corrected in the visible page and reflected in the modification date. If a claim cannot be verified promptly and could materially affect a buyer decision, it should be qualified or removed while the evidence is reviewed.
